Section: New Results
Shape optimization under uncertainties
Surrogate-Assisted Bounding-Box Approach Applied to Constrained Multi-Objective Optimisation Under Uncertainty
P.M. Congedo, M. Rivier
This work is devoted to tackling constrained multi-objective optimisation under uncertainty problems. In particular, the SABBa (Surrogate-Assisted Bounding-Box approach) framework is applied and extended to handle both robust and reliability-based constrained optimisation problems. This approach aims at efficiently dealing with uncertainty-based optimisation problems, with approximated robustness and reliability measures. A Bounding-Box (or conservative box) is defined as a multi-dimensional product of intervals centred on approximated objectives and constraints and containing the underlying true values. In SABBa, this approach is supplemented with a Surrogate-Assisting strategy, which is very effective to reduce the overall computational cost, notably during the last iterations of the optimisation. The efficiency of the method is further increased using the concept of Pareto Optimal Probability (POP) computed for each box, and proposing some estimations for conservative error computation and box refinement using a Gaussian Process (GP).
A quantile-based optimization under uncertainty of an ORC turbine cascade
P.M. Congedo, N. Razaaly
This study presents an original and fast robust shape optimization approach to overcome the limitation of a deterministic optimization that neglects operating conditions variability, applied on a typical 2D ORC turbine cascade (Biere). Flow around the blade is solved by means of inviscid simulation using the open-source SU2 code, considering Non-Ideal gas effects modeled through the use of the Peng-Robinson-Stryjek-Vera equation of state, from which a Quantity of Interest (QoI) is recovered. We propose here a mono-objective formulation consisting in minimizing the -quantile of the QoI under a constraint, at a low computational cost. This is performed by using an efficient robust optimization approach, coupling a state-of- the-art quantile estimation and a classical bayesian optimization method. First, the advantages of a quantile-based formulations are illustrated with respect to a classical mean-based robust optimization. Secondly, we demonstrate the effectiveness of applying this robust optimization framework with a low-fidelity inviscid solver by comparing the resulting optimal design with the ones obtained with a deterministic optimization using a high-fidelity turbulent solver.